EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL NA BASE NACIONAL COMUM CURRICULAR E AS IDEIAS EDUCACIONAIS DE CARL ROGERS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31512/19819250.2025.26.01.284-307

Keywords:

Carl Rogers, Educação, Educação Infantil, Pesquisa documental, Pesquisa bibliográfica

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the educational approach proposed by Carl Rogers and the national regulations that govern Early Childhood Education in Brazil. Documentary and bibliographic research methods are used to discuss primary and secondary sources relating to Rogerian educational proposals and the materials that support the structuring of Brazilian Early Childhood Education. Subsequently, the information is discussed in terms of structuring, approximations and distances. Among the findings, it stands out that both perspectives are similar in the use of senses to promote an educational experience, in the creation of an environment conducive to learning, in the appreciation of the child as the protagonist of the learning process and in the emphasis on the relationship between teacher- student. However, they distance themselves in relation to educational methodological practice and the nature of its exercise. In view of this, it’s concluded that the study points to an explanation as to why there are no schools in Brazil that are guided by the Rogerian framework in their educational stages, especially in Early Childhood.

Author Biographies

Rafaela Firmino Leite, Universidade Federal do Ceará

Graduanda em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal do Ceará. Membro do Núcleo de Estudos em Psicologia Humanista. 

Paulo Coelho Castelo Branco, Universidade Federal do Ceará

Docente do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Ceará. Pós-Doutor e Doutor em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Bolsista Produtividade do CNPq. 

Published

2025-05-09

How to Cite

Leite, R. F., & Castelo Branco, P. C. (2025). EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL NA BASE NACIONAL COMUM CURRICULAR E AS IDEIAS EDUCACIONAIS DE CARL ROGERS. Revista De Ciências Humanas, 26(1), 284–307. https://doi.org/10.31512/19819250.2025.26.01.284-307